Skip to main content

A Case-Matched Study Comparing Surgery to No Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

 Research Article

Volume 3, Issue 9 (September Issue) 

Sheweidin Aziz*, Omar A. Gabbar and Grahame J.S. Taylor

Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK

*Corresponding author: Sheweidin Aziz, Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK. E-mail: sheweidin@gmail.com

Received: October 15, 2021; Accepted: October 24, 2021; Published: November 08, 2021

Citation: Sheweidin Aziz, Gabbar OA, Grahame J.S. Taylor, et al. A Case-Matched Study Comparing Surgery to No Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. Clin Image Case Rep J. 2021; 3(9): 187.

Abstract

Background: Patients with MSCC present with pain and/or neurological loss. NICE guidance recommends surgery to prevent paralysis or manage pain in paralysed patients. There is only one RCT comparing surgery with no surgery, which strongly recommends surgery, however, there have been advances in radiotherapy with better local control and lower normal tissue toxicity.

Objectives: To compare surgery with no surgery for neurological change, survival, length of stay and re-admissions.

Methods: A case-matched cohort study. To overcome the ethical difficulty of not offering surgery to MSCC patients; patients declining offered surgery were matched with patients proceeding with surgery. Twenty-seven patients declining surgery were matched to 54 receiving surgeries. Match criteria were in order by the primary tumour, presentation neurological grade (ambulatory, weight-bearing, bed-bound and paralysed), co-morbidities (ASA grade), age and gender. Data collected from the MSCC database, clinical letters and clinical coding. Statistical analysis used GraphPad Prism version 8.2.

Results: Matching accuracy was confirmed with no significant difference shown between the groups, p>0.6. Of those declining surgery, 3 improved and 3 deteriorated by 1 grade. Of those proceeding with surgery, improvement occurred in 1 by 2 grades and 5 by 1 grade; deterioration occurred in 3 by 2 grades and 9 by 1 grade. The net neurological grade change with no surgery was 0 whereas with surgery there was a loss of 8 grades (p=0.047).
At 3 months, survival rates were 83% in the surgery group and 61% in the no surgery group (p=0.05). The average initial length of stay in the surgery group was 21 vs. 10 days in the no surgery group (p<0>

Conclusion: Surgery resulted in a higher proportion of patients deteriorating neurologically and a longer length of stay but patients lived longer.

Keywords: Case-matched; Metastases; MSCC; Spinal metastases; Neurological outcome

https://www.literaturepublishers.org/archive/A-Case-Matched-Study-Comparing-Surgery-to-No-Surgery-in-Patients-with-Metastatic-Spinal-Cord-Compression.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recurrent Phytobezoar Presenting with Small Bowel Obstruction

Recurrent Phytobezoar Presenting with Small Bowel Obstruction *Corresponding author: Louise Dunphy, Department of Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK, E-mail: Louise.Dunphy@doctors.org.uk Citation: Louise Dunphy, Syed Hussain Abbas and Stephen Baxter, et al. Recurrent Phytobezoar Presenting with Small Bowel Obstruction. Clin Image Case Rep J. 2019; 1(1): 105. Abstract  Small bowel obstruction is a common presentation to the emergency department, with causes including adhesions, hernia, malignancy, volvulus or complications of inflammatory bowel disease such as a stricture in Crohn’s disease. Indeed, it accounts for 20% of hospital admissions annually. Phytobezoars are a concentration of poorly digested fruit such as orange pith or pulp and vegetable fibres found in the alimentary tract in patients with a history of previous surgery or persimmon in patients without [1]. Small bowel phytobezoars are rare and are almost always obstructive. They pose a diagnostic a...

Exporter of Reprints (Printed Material)

  What is Reprints? Reprints generally refer to copies of a previously published work. The meaning can vary slightly depending on the context: In Publishing (Books, Journals, Articles): • Reprints are additional printed copies of an article or book that has already been published. • Authors often request reprints of their scientific or medical journal articles to distribute to colleagues, conferences, or patients. • Book reprints are new print runs of a previously released edition, often without changes. Example • A doctor publishes a case report in a journal and requests 500 reprints to distribute at a medical conference. • A publisher prints a second batch of an already released novel — that’s a reprint. Use of Reprints Published article hard copy and reprints may be used to display the potential of the article at interviews, conferences, distribution to colleagues, seminars and other promotional activities, etc. Exporter of Reprints (Printed Material) We are an ex...

Clinical Images and Case Reports Journal

  Clinical Images and Case Reports Journal (CICRJ)  is a peer-reviewed high impact factor PMC indexed medical journal established Internationally which provides a platform to publish Clinical Images, Medical Case Reports, Clinical Case Reports, Case Series (series of 2 to 6 cases), Research, Reviews and Clinical Videos in Medicine. Journal encourages publication of medical case reports for physicians and medical aspirants to share different results in the form of clinical image articles and medical case reports, which have been encountered in different medical sub-specialties or cases which leads to a higher understanding of the medical conditions, medicines, diagnosis and management. Medical case reports journal presents different possibilities to enhance worldwide health outcomes. Clinical case reports journal publishes methods of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases. Clinical imaging journal will consider any original case report in medicine that...